May 16, 2012

Confronting the question of inclusion

 By the Rev. Maria Kane

As I pulled into my friend Frances’ gravel driveway six years ago, I could barely contain my excitement. A year earlier, Frances--an unassuming fifty-ish woman who loved the color green, turtlenecks, and Native American history--had quietly and rather imperceptibly broken through the layers of my wounded soul and guided me in to a place of awe and wonder. Now, we were reuniting for a weekend visit.

After exchanging hugs on the front porch and dropping off my luggage in the warmly-appointed guest room, she led me to the kitchen and with a deep appreciation in her eyes, introduced me to Marie, her partner of twenty-five years. Wait. Frances is gay? How did I miss that? I wondered. Reaching out to hug Marie I tried to conceal my surprise.

Although I joined the Episcopal Church as a teenager, I still struggled to eradicate the voices of moral superiority that had shaped my evangelical childhood. While I knew people who were gay or lesbian, I had always assumed an attitude of measured distance and indifference, not quite believing that they were “living in sin,” but also unwilling to confront questions of inclusion and justice. “Live and let live” was my attitude. Standing in Marie and Frances’ sun-light kitchen I found myself questioning those beliefs.


Later that afternoon, over bowls of piping-hot chili, I tried to push my questions aside as we watched the Duke Blue Devils battle it out on the basketball court against the North Carolina Tarheels. There is perhaps no greater rivalry in college basketball than these two schools, and as Frances and Marie pulled for the Tarheels, my passion and devotion to the Blue Devils only increased. I love Duke. Following the game, we laughed, cried, and shared stories with one another long in to the night. Still, I kept waiting for some sign, some signal, that things would now be different between Frances and me...but I couldn’t find it.

That night, as I turned to my journal to explore my thoughts, I found myself overcome with tears and sorrow. Less than a year earlier--unsure of my vocation and my future--I had begun training in chaplaincy at a state psychiatric hospital. Frances was my supervisor. Over the course of six months, Frances patiently helped me acknowledge and later welcome the scars of my life as places waiting to be transformed into founts of grace and glory. When we gathered each week to discuss my experiences on the hospital floor, she provided a safe space to laugh, cry, and ask tough questions of myself and the Church. Together, we formed a deep friendship. As I observed her interactions with others, I saw in her a deep embodiment of Christ’s love for the outcast and the lonely, a love that emanated from deep within her soul. I was forever changed because of her. Now, months later, after a delightful and spirited evening, the tears fell as I imagined what my life might have been like had we never met, had I never benefited from our time together.

All my life, I had been told something was amiss between whose relationships didn’t mirror my Cosby Show image of the family. Yet, watching Frances and Marie interact suggested that their love was not amiss. In fact, it was rich, deep, and patient--just as God loves us. I wanted that in all my relationships--not the false image of perfection, but the love born of authenticity and deep faithfulness. I knew I could no longer avoid questions of inclusion. Indeed, they became less a matter of inclusion and justice, but about helping to usher in God’s kingdom in all its fulness. Here. Now.

Today, I am much more passionate about serving a Church that reflects what I believe to be the fullness of God’s creative grace. It’s part of my work and my relationships. I’m also closer to Marie and Frances more than ever. Now, the only thing standing between us is their regrettable taste in basketball teams. Thanks be to God.

6 comments:

  1. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous comments are not permitted on this site. Please identify yourself with your name and parish. Anonymous posts will be deleted. (See our guidelines)

      Delete
  2. For most of the history of the church in most places where it has carried the gospel it has not been acceptable to be gay or lesbian. As such, most persons oriented toward the same gender kept quiet about their feelings and remained very private in their activities – a lifestyle that came to be known as remaining in the closet. Perhaps as early as the 1950s the stigma against being gay or lesbian began to be challenged throughout western society. As more and more people came out about their sexuality the church encountered something it did not expect: it discovered in many congregations individuals oriented toward the same gender who have been embodying the baptismal vows, carrying out extraordinary ministries, participating in worship, and (in some cases) serving in the ordained ministry. In addition, it became evident that within the church there are same-gender couples who have been in a lifelong, committed relationship marked by “fidelity, monogamy, mutual affection and respect, careful, honest communication, and the holy love which enables those in such relationships to see in each other the image of God.” The problem for the church is this: if homosexuality is a sin how then is it possible for homosexual people to live faithful Christian lives in every other aspect?

    I appreciate Maria's post because it beautifully reflects her encounter with this fundamental question. Her story is echoed by tens of thousands of others in the Episcopal Church. We are finding good fruit growing on the branches of what we have always believed to be bad trees - something Jesus says is not possible. The church, in an attempt to be faithful, is rethinking its old assumptions and understandings in order to make sense of how God's Spirit is being manifested in the lives of people like Francis and Marie.

    Keith Emerson
    St. Paul's, Suffolk

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Obviously Maria's two friends are warm and engaging people and her anecdotal narrative was very interesting and well-written. Unfortunately the larger questions of scriptural authority or Christian traditions were not addressed. If Christianity were simply able to formulate its doctrines by experience, it would cease to be the Biblical, historic faith once delivered unto the saints. Scripture, natural law, and two thousand years of traditon argue for monogamy between one man and one woman. Our experiences may argue for a much wider range of beliefs and doctrines not just in the area of sexual morality but in other areas, as well. Sadly when the Church takes its teaching from popular culture and practice, there is no limit to allowable behavior or belief.
      James Deviese
      Christ the King

      Delete
    2. James,

      Thank you for reading this blog and for taking the time to share your thoughts. Because of the short nature of these posts I did not include how I have indeed wrestled with Scripture on this issue. My intent in writing this post was not to throw out Scripture or tradition; it was to illustrate how one particular experience (over a period of time) forced me to not only confront my inhibitions, but to also delve more deeply into Scripture and prayer. I don't believe (and I pray) I am not disregarding Scripture. It's just the opposite. I began looking more carefully at historical context, methods of interpretation, as well as recognizing that the Holy Spirit is not always so black and white and calls us to live in the tension of only seeing through a glass dimly.

      My hope is that through this story I can share one way in which our conversation surrounding the blessing of same-sex unions not merely "an issue." These are people with stories, families, jobs, and everything else that comes with being human. It can be easy to debate something when it appears to be an issue or right vs. wrong and not living, breathing people who love God just as deeply as the rest of us.

      Thank you for sharing your perspective James.

      Delete
    3. Hello Maria,
      Thank you for your response. I apprecite your willingness to do comment a second time.
      Your first paragraph seems to be saying essentially that you practically accept an "open canon" or possibly a very elastic canon of scripture. I cannot say how much you have looked at "...the historical context, methods of interpretation..." of scripture regarding homosexuality. I can tell you that I have done so and find the practice of homosexuality incompatible with the Bible. If you would like to discuss any of the passages, please let me know. The background information provided on this site is hermeneutically unsophisticated and not defensible.
      Again, your anecdotal position was interesting and I appreicated you giving it. But Christians do not set morality based upon anecdotes. After all, there are probably many fine and charming polygamists we would both like if we knew them better.
      James Deviese, Christ the King

      Delete

Please begin your post with your name and parish. Any comments without this information will be deleted. Review our Commenting Guidelines.

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.