By Tony Robinson, St. Thomas, Chesapeake
I must admit that I have been struggling with what to write for this
blog ever since I was asked to do so in December. I wasn’t sure why I found it so difficult,
but in the end I guess it was because I was asking the wrong questions. Just as I think many in this debate are answering
the wrong question.
One side defends their position as a matter of absolute Biblical
interpretation, the other as a matter of absolute grace. One side berates the other as unfaithful to
the Word of God; the other as unfaithful to the ministry of Jesus.
Oh, it’s all done with civility (for the most part), but the underlying
tone is still there. The explanations of
positions do little. Minds are
unchanged; hearts are unmoved; and the road toward anger and schism is built
with the paving stones of misunderstanding.
But what is being misunderstood?
Each side interprets Scripture and knows that if they just use the
right method to explain it, the other side will see the error of their ways and
correct their way of thinking. But I
think that this makes an erroneous and potentially dangerous assumption; i.e.
that the Holy Spirit is not working in that other person.
People on both sides of this issue approach Scripture prayerfully and
spiritually and come to different conclusions. Why?
Is it because one side is filled entirely with bigots, and the other
side’s only interest is in political expedience? Or is it possible that the interpretation of
Scripture and the awakening to the movement of the Holy Spirit is not an
either/or situation. Perhaps, the Holy
Spirit reveals things differently to different people so that they are prepared
to minister differently in different situations.
My wife and I disagree on some things, yet we still are able to come to
meals together, share the same food and drink, commune with each other. In anticipation of the responses below, I
will ask myself this question, “but what if I found my wife had been
unfaithful?” As I know many feel that
the opposition is in exactly that position.
Well that is where my metaphor breaks down because my wife and I share
facilities: house, cars, finances, etc.
So let’s adjust the metaphor. One
would be hard-pressed to find two people more different than my brother and
me. Our belief structures, lifestyles,
goals and desires are diametrically opposed.
He does what he does in his house and I in mine. But in our lives we dine together, grieve and
celebrate together. And when the time
comes we will minister to our parents together.
And through it all we still share the same name.
And that is the beauty of the Episcopal Church. We have different houses, different ways of
doing ministry, but we still commune together.
Still support each other, and lift each other up.
We still share the name Christian.
“If all were a single member, where would the body be?” (I Corinthians
12:19)

I cannot imagine anyone could have shared this message more eloquently, more appropriately, more generously than you have, Tony. I am really struck by the image of two very different siblings- who share the same name. Excellent post!
ReplyDeleteAshley Scruggs
Youth Missioner
Tony,
ReplyDeletePlease allow me to take a contrary position to yours. While interpreting scripture does have a personal element to it, hermeneutics are not a matter of total subjectivism. Which is what you seem to be saying.
The Church has interpreted scripture in light of tradition and reason. Any heretical group or individual can go to the Bible and find just about anything conceivable. Just look around on the internet for an hour to confirm what I am saying.
Orthodox Christianity within all major bodies has historically understood homosexuality to be proscribed by holy writ. Furthermore, in my opinion,
there is no possibility of any other understanding of this practice. Of course, I am speaking of the actual practice and not the mere orientation of homosexuality.
James Deviese
Christ the King