By The Rev. James Medley, Associate Priest
Eastern Shore Chapel, Virginia Beach
Eastern Shore Chapel, Virginia Beach
The disputed question is an
ancient practice of the medieval Church where groups of students bring forth
opposing arguments about theological questions (normally questions not having
to do with core doctrine) and debate their contrasting points. The
master (professor) resolved the dispute by making a doctrinal decision as to
which argument was correct.
The disputation is also used today
in most, if not all, Episcopal seminaries.
I remember participating in the discipline at the Seminary of the
Southwest under our theology professor, Anthony Baker. Tony
would give us a question like, “Does scripture contain everything necessary for
salvation?” or “Does God suffer?” and then divide a group of us into two
teams. One team had to defend the yes point
and one defend the no point. After each team made brilliant arguments
(drawing on scripture, early theologians, and reason) Tony would tell us who
made the better argument and then which answer, yes or no, was correct from the
standpoint of the orthodox faith of the Church.
Tony had only one hard and fast
rule for our disputations: a participant could never argue from the position of
unsupported belief. For example, we couldn’t say, “The answer is
this because that’s just what I believe.”
You had to argue from the
evidence of your sources. Sometimes that evidence was inconclusive,
especially if the question being disputed concerned issues that weren’t
considered matters of core doctrine by the Church. On
those types of questions, we sometimes had to agree to disagree, even to the
point of disagreeing with our professor.





