by The Rev. Drew Foisie
Curate for Christian Formation, Old Donation, Virginia Beach
People today don’t have to look far for reasons to dislike celibacy and distance themselves from any endorsement of it. The tragic and appalling, wide-spread abuse perpetrated by an alarming and disturbing number of Roman Catholic priests is enough to make anybody want to cut celibacy from any equation of faithful living. In addition, the wider culture exudes a deep distaste and distrust for myriad forms of faithful living involving self-denial, abstinence and celibacy chief among them. The cultural subtext being that any ordering of one’s life that resembles self-denial is a form of “repression.” And yet despite its difficult and sometimes unpopular reputation, celibacy has been and remains a valuable and transformative source of life within the Christian tradition. It is a gift from God that the Apostle Paul and countless other saints have known. But many feel this gift to be far outside their sense of call or Christian vocation. And indeed, celibacy is not for everyone. Regarding celibacy Jesus said, “Not everyone can accept this teaching, but only those to whom it is given.” It must then be granted that some are not given this gift, but also that some are indeed given this gift, and given the grace to live it out.
As a permanent state, celibacy touches all aspects of one’s life. In many respects it has more in common with marriage than it does with mere “abstinence,” and yet it remains distinctly unique from either. It is the ordering of one’s lifelong sexual fidelity toward God, rather than a spouse. Abstinence, on the other hand, may be understood as a decision to abstain from sexual activity for an indefinite period of time so that one’s physical, moral and spiritual self is set apart, or made “holy,” for the purpose of faithfully receiving God’s gift of a relationship. All Christians are called to be chaste, or rightly ordered in all things, some in celibacy and some in marriage.

The Very Rev'd Jeffrey John, Dean of St Alban's Cathedral in the UK, gave an excellent interview to a reporter from the (London) _Times_this week which addressed some of these issues--particularly the link between blessing of same-sex relationships and the sacrament of marriage. See particularly question 3 in the interview, all of which which is transcribed here:
ReplyDeletehttp://networkedblogs.com/v95OV
The Rev. Gillian R. Barr
Canterbury Center at ODU
In 1999, the Biblical Recorder, North Carolina’s Baptist paper, told that, at an affiliated university, discrimination against sexual orientation has been dropped. Trustee Clint Hopkins, a retired pastor, voted for the new policy stating, “Jesus never made sexual habits an issue with his followers. We want to be as much like Jesus as possible.” You may recall when the woman, who was caught in adultery, was brought to Jesus. Did he seem to care about her sexual activity? What did he tell her, “Go and sin some more”? No! In John 8:11, He said “go and sin no more.” – in other words stop committing adultery. Clint Hopkins went on to say “It isn’t proper for us to give too much attention to sex in deciding who is in and out of the kingdom.” Oh? Then was Paul improper when he wrote, under the influence of The Holy Spirit (1Corinthians, 6:9-10), Do not be deceived; neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor homosexuals, nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers, shall inherit the kingdom of God. Four of the six lifestyles he mentioned have something to do with sexual relations. And in 1 Timothy 1: 6-10, Paul wrote For some men, straying from these things, have turned aside to fruitless discussions, wanting to be teachers of the Law, even though they do not understand either what they are saying or the matters about which they make confident assertions. But we know that the Law is good… realizing the fact that the law is not made for a righteous man, but for those who are lawless and rebellious, for the ungodly and sinners, for the unholy and profane, for those who kill their fathers and mothers, for murderers, and immoral men and homosexuals and kidnappers and liars and perjurers, and whatever else is contrary to sound teaching.
ReplyDeleteIn Ephesians, Paul makes sexuality an evidence of salvation. This then, makes it an issue of whether or not a person is in or out of the kingdom. Paul is not saying you cannot be forgiven of these things. He is saying you cannot remain unrepentant, and believe that God will cover His holy eyes, pat you on the back, and say, “Everything is okay.” By the way, that passage in Ephesians is 5:3-6… But do not let immorality or any impurity be named among you... For this you know with certainty, that no immoral or impure person... has an inheritance in the kingdom of Christ and God. Let no one deceive you with empty words…
At a time when we seem poised to dismiss Holy Scripture, or become revisionists, I must remind clergy of their Ordination vows (one sacrament I pray we will always hold holy)
Will you be diligent in the reading and study of the Holy Scriptures, and in seeking the knowledge of such things as may make you a stronger and more able minister of Christ?
Receive this Bible as a sign of the authority given you to preach the Word of God and to administer his holy Sacraments. Do not forget the trust committed to you as a priest of the Church of God.
Will you be loyal to the doctrine, discipline, and worship of Christ as this Church has received them?
I am willing and ready to do so; and I solemnly declare that I do believe the Holy Scriptures of the Old and New Testaments to be the Word of God, and to contain all things necessary to
salvation; and I do solemnly engage to conform to the doctrine, discipline, and worship of The Episcopal Church.
Kerry Holmes
Ben Carey MD
DeleteGalilee Church
Virginia Beach
Kerry Holmes,
See my multiple posts under the blog started by Eileen Walsh as I am addressing the same issues from both a medical and scriptural basis beginning with my response to Rev. Walsh.
Ben Carey
Kerry,
DeleteYour gloss on the story of the woman taken in adultery (John 8) ignores one of Jesus’ persistent, troubling tendencies. Have you noticed that the woman never says “I’m sorry” or anything at all to indicate that she is repentant? Jesus seems routinely reluctant to condemn persons that we might be tempted to view as deeply sinful , immoral folks. Our understanding of what repentance, forgiveness, & mercy look like must be informed by Jesus’ confusing choice to not condemn the woman. The troubling tendency of Jesus suggests that his definition of “sin” may be irritatingly different from the categories we once thought were so clear-cut and scripturally valid. Why do you think that is? Would you tell me more about how you find this story applying to your own life?
Your willingness to prooftext vigorously makes me interested to hear you share more about how you understand your role as a person of color in the Christian Church. I had raised this issue two weeks ago in the comments on Steve Gallotta’s headline post, but have not yet heard back from you.
Hoping to hear more,
Ben
Thanks for highlighting this issue, Rev. Foisie. Given the way that St. Paul privileges the celibate state over persons marrying one another, it seems that all discussion of Christian marriage (straight or gay) should recognize that celibates are--perhaps ironically--the experts on what marital relationships look like when marked by the Holy Spirit.
ReplyDeleteThe end of your post highlights your concern over a conflation between the married & celibate states. Is that a conflation you see happening already, or a future possibility you wish to avoid? And is that then to say that you would reserve the category of marriage for heterosexual relationships and celibacy for gay & lesbian relationships?
-Ben
P.S. - for anyone interested in reading further, Elizabeth Abbott's book _A History of Celibacy_ is a fascinating text.