June 6, 2012

Do our differences have to keep us apart?

 By Juli Edwards, St. Christopher's, Portsmouth

The Episcopal Church welcomes you.  The church is a safe space where we can escape the persecution of the outside world, right?  A place where all our sins are forgiven and we can be ourselves, accepted as we are, loved and welcomed by all?  Although many may strive for this and this is what many may believe and feel the church should be offering, it is not the reality.  This kind of belief only makes the pain hurt more when people disagree, when someone is asked to leave, or told that they are not welcome as they are in a parish.  Do our differences have to keep us apart?

There are times in our lives when we all come together despite our differences.  Examples of these times are weddings, funerals, family gatherings, etc.  The church is our family and we should learn to come together despite our differences.  These blog posts have offered a starting space to practicing just that.  Can we treat one another with respect?  Can we learn to listen and really hear one another?  Can we sit in the pew and, although some may disagree with the blessing of same-gender unions, be prayerfully present? 


There are many on each side of this disputed question.  There are those who feel to their core that it is the wrong Christian thing to go forward with blessings of same-gender unions.  There are those who believe that God is very present in their same-gender commitment to the person they love or in the same-gender relationship of their friend or family member.  Whichever direction our diocese goes following General Convention there will be those who are hurt deeply by that decision.  How do we deal with this hurt?

When we are hurting we often go to see our spiritual leaders to talk it out and get some feedback on ways to deal with our hurt.  We also will often seek support and love from our church family.  We know that a decision is going to be made one way or the other following General Convention and we should begin to plan now how we will continue to live out our promise to one another with Christ still at the center of our relationships. 

This blog is one way we are practicing, sharing together despite our differences.  Each of our individual parishes may want to have their own way for us to come together and support each other through the hurt some will have.  What I believe is most important is to be honest with one another.  To talk about our hurt or to listen to those who are hurting.  It is through listening to one another we can begin to understand where the other person is coming from. 

What can we do to support one other through the pain and ensure we are living the life Christ intended for us, loving one another as ourselves?

2 comments:

  1. It is unfortunate that differences keep people from truly enjoying one another but they do to some people and probably always will. There will always be folks who think that their ways, thoughts, and interpretations are the only way to believe. There will always be some who preach hate instead of God's love. And there will always be folks who will exclude others because they are different. I wish that weren't the way it is but alas, it is human nature.
    Recently I read an article by Rev. Susan Russell, an Epsicopal priest with the Diocese on Los Angeles where she stated that, "God's love is radically inclusive." I embrace this and spread this message to all I meet, God loves you - just the way you are!! I wish others would embrace it as well! Until they do we must continue to love each other, accept them, invite them to the table and spread the Good News of Jesus Christ!
    Susan Pederson
    St. Stephen's
    Integrity - DioSoVa

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Susan,
      The fundamental problem is never going away because of the manner in which the two factions define "...the Good News of Jesus Christ..." to quote your posting of 8 June. One group sees the Gospel in terms of scriptural, progressive liberation from sin whereas the opposing group bases its definitions on a postmodern and humanistic lexicon. In other words, the two factions will continue talking on wholly different wavelengths.
      As far as Susan Russell's definition of radical inclusiveness, I would venture that I could list quite a few people she would not willingly welcome within her fellowship.
      James Deviese, Christ the King

      Delete

Please begin your post with your name and parish. Any comments without this information will be deleted. Review our Commenting Guidelines.

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.